news/article

ADVERT

Tubeless Conversion for Adventure Bikes: Worth the Effort?

Published on January 6th, 2026 by

Spoked wheels with tubes present the classic adventure bike dilemma: the wheel design best suited for off-road impacts requires tubes that puncture more easily than tubeless setups and are harder to repair in the field. Converting spoked wheels to run tubeless tyres has become increasingly popular among long-distance adventure riders, promising the puncture resistance of tubeless with the durability of traditional spoked construction. But the conversion process has trade-offs that deserve examination beyond the marketing enthusiasm.

Conversion systems fall into two categories: rim tape solutions and mechanical sealing systems. Rim tape approaches use specialized tape to seal spoke holes, creating an airtight rim bed that holds air like a cast tubeless wheel. Outex, Tubliss, and similar products represent this category, with varying complexity and effectiveness. Mechanical systems like Tubliss insert a secondary bladder that pressurizes the tyre bead while the main tyre volume runs at lower pressure without a tube. Each approach has advocates who swear by reliability; each has critics with failure stories.

The practical benefit of tubeless conversion is puncture management. Small punctures that would flatten a tube seal themselves with sealant fluid, often without the rider noticing. Larger punctures can be plugged from the outside using standard tubeless repair kits—a five-minute fix compared to the thirty-minute process of removing a wheel, breaking a bead, replacing a tube, and reassembling. For remote riding where punctures occur far from assistance, this difference matters enormously. Several hours of daylight can separate successful and unsuccessful wilderness puncture repairs.

Reliability concerns persist despite years of refinement. Rim tape systems can lose seal if the tape ages, gets contaminated with sealant buildup, or suffers spoke movement that creates leak paths. Tubliss systems add complexity that some riders find reassuring (the redundant bladder) while others find worrying (more potential failure points). Forum threads about conversions feature equal parts enthusiastic endorsement and frustrated complaint, suggesting that installation technique and riding conditions influence outcomes substantially.

Advertisement

My recommendation: tubeless conversion makes sense for riders who travel in remote areas where self-sufficiency is essential and who are willing to maintain the system correctly. Casual adventure riders who stay on maintained roads with mobile reception nearby may find the expense and complexity unnecessary—carrying a spare tube and basic repair kit addresses most scenarios adequately. The technology has matured significantly, but it's not yet the obvious default choice that some advocates suggest.